Biggert-Waters Act could devastate St.
Tammany, Slidell City Council told
By
St. Tammany Parish President Pat Brister told the Slidell City
Council Tuesday that the Biggert-Waters Act, coupled with proposed FEMA
flood maps that decertify
some levees and pump stations, could leave a trail of devastation across the
parish. But, she said, the parish has joined with others in south Louisiana to try and delay implementation of
the act and new maps.
"We have made some progress,'' Brister
said, noting
that she and several other area parish presidents have traveled to Washington,
D.C., to lobby Congress, and continues to hold twice-weekly conference
calls to discuss developments. She said the coalition against Biggert-Waters
has grown to include other states, particularly New York and New Jersey , which experienced massive flooding
in Superstorm Sandy last year.
"It's no longer considered a Gulf Coast issue,'' Brister said. "Because
of Superstorm Sandy, they understand.''
Brister was on the council's agenda
Tuesday to discuss the "state of the parish.'' But her comments centered
on the flood insurance issue, which has commanded the attention of countless
area residents and business owners in recent months.
The Biggert-Waters Act was signed
into law in 2012 with the hope of stabilizing the National
Flood Insurance Program, which is billions of dollars in debt. It eliminates
flood insurance subsidies to homeowners, as well as "grandfathering,"
which allowed properties built in accordance with previous standards to
maintain their current insurance rates.
FEMA, meanwhile, has also proposed
tougher new flood elevations in many areas of south Louisiana .
Brister said the coalition seeks to
restore the grandfathering clause, and to have the FEMA maps amended to take
into account local flood protection efforts. The proposed maps do not recognize
the parish's levees or pumping stations, she said.
Brister said there would be a
"rippling effect,'' to such Draconian insurance costs. Homes would lose
their value as their owners could not cover the insurance notes; banks would be
stuck with bad loans; jobs would be lost; parishes would lose out on millions
in tax revenue as assessments plummeted.
Brister said officials understand the
goal of Biggert-Waters, and do support efforts to make the flood program
financially healthy. But, she told the council, this is "too much, too
fast and it's too drastic.''
Brister praised Louisiana 's Congressional delegation for its
unity and efforts to stave off Biggert-Waters. Earlier this month, the U.S.
House approved an amendment to the bill that funds FEMA by Rep. Bill Cassidy,
R-La., that would essentially block the implementation of Biggert-Waters.
Brister said she is confident the
Senate will embrace the effort to block implementation, as well.
Our delegation in D.C. has
"worked tirelessly to get us some relief. They must.''
No comments:
Post a Comment