Parish presidents band together to fight
against Biggert-Waters, flood insurance rate hikes
By
St. Charles Parish President V.J. St. Pierre is
one of a coalition of parish presidents from across
|
Five area parish presidents will gather Friday morning at the
home of St.
Charles Parish residents
Lisa and Robert Taylor in Bayou
Gauche to
discuss the anticipated ramifications of the Biggert-Waters
Act on local communities,
and lay out a road map for fighting against the implementation of the
controversial law.
The
Biggert-Waters Act was signed into law in July of 2012, and eliminates flood
insurance subsidies to homeowners, as well as the practice of “grandfathering”
– allowing a property to maintain its current flood insurance rate because it
was built in accordance to previously established standards. By eliminating the
grandfathering clause, homeowners who built in compliance to prior codes will
be faced
with astronomical flood insurance rate hikes as their communities are
re-mapped. The reason for the increases is to stabilize the National Flood
Insurance Program, which is roughly $27 billion in debt.
Two weeks ago, seven parish presidents and representatives from
14 parishes across Louisiana traveled to Washington, D.C., to meet with the
Louisiana congressional delegation and advocate for amending the law, and
reinstating an updated version of the grandfathering clause in which insurance
rates would remain attached to the properties rather than individual
homeowners.
The projected
flood insurance rate increases, especially for residents living in Bayou
Gauche, Des Allemands and Paradis – where an existing levee that was reflected
on previous flood insurance rate maps was removed from the most recent maps,
increasing base flood elevation levels for residents by a measure of ten feet –
are astronomical.
“You can do everything right: our home was built to the
standards FEMA gave to the builder; our home was above [the standards],” said
Robert Taylor, the meeting’s host. “Now FEMA is coming back after the game and
saying, ‘Sorry, we were wrong. This is what the flood elevation should have
been, and this is what it costs.' They’re telling me I have to pay $28,000 to
ensure my home for flood. I can’t do that; my home is going to go away. All of
the hard work my wife and I have done to put money into paying off our home,
trying to do the best we can to pay it off early…now my home is being taken
away.”
St. Charles
Parish President V.J. St. Pierre, who traveled to Washington , D.C. , with the Louisiana delegation, said that although the
fight against Biggert-Waters consists of “baby steps,” he and other Louisiana officials are “not ready to give up
the fight. There’s a lot of work to be done,” he said. “We don’t want a
hand-out – we want the National Flood Insurance Program to be self-sufficient,
too – but it needs to be reasonable.”
St. Tammany
Parish President Pat Brister who also traveled to Washington , D.C. , two weeks ago, and returned to the
nation’s capital last week, said the most important thing to understand is that
“when we talk about flood insurance plans, it’s more than just South Louisiana , even though we’re leading the
charge. The biggest message is, this is going to affect a lot of people around
the country,” she added. “It’s about more than just us.” Brister said that
outside of the Louisiana congressional delegation, other
lawmakers – including Sen. Chuck Schumer, D–N.Y. and Sen. Robert Menendez,
D-N.J. are also on board.
“Two
solutions are, grandfathering has to be reinstated for structures that have
been built to code, and not suffered from repetitive losses,” said Michael
Hecht, president and CEO of GNO, Inc., the economic development organization
that organized the Washington, D.C. trip. “The second is that the [flood] maps
need to be made more holistic, to take into account physical features like levees
and pumping systems that mitigate flooding, as opposed to considering only
100-year hurricane protection levees.
“This is one
of the purest examples of unintended consequences that I think we’ve seen,”
Hecht added. “I don’t think anyone thought [Biggert-Waters] would punish those
who followed the letter of the law. One of our challenges is managing this
period of uncertainty, as we move from unintended ocnsequense to statutory and
administrative solutions.”
St. John the
Baptist Parish President Natalie Robottom said that she and her fellow parish
presidents have been working together to draft a new piece of legislation
regarding the grandfathering clause, and may attempt to move it through
Congress. Just this week, an amendment sponsored by Sen. David Vitter,R-La.,
and Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., that would have delayed the new federal flood
insurance rules for five years failed by one vote.
"We've
started working on draft language that we think would be fair...and may be
looking at introducing a new bill," said Robottom. "We need to have
solutions."
Sign me up! When's the march on Washington?? Again I'll say it: anywhere you can live, there are risks, but no one is talking about abandoning California b/c of earthquakes and no one is telling the midwest to build undergroung b/c of tornadoes. So let's understand where our economic engines lay and help them instead.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget the wildfires in California, tornado alley, etc... Mother Nature owns everywhere -- someone should tell Cuomo and the other politicians that. Does home insurance have high premiums for houses prone to earthquakes? No, yet FEMA bails them out. Does Home insurance have high premiums for houses in tornado alley? No, yet FEMA bails them out. ETC.... the ONLY federal home insurance is FLOOD insurance.... why is it a federal program? Why?
ReplyDelete