Tucked away on the west side of the small town of Broad Channel in the middle of Jamiaca Bay is a narrow, dead end, street that goes by the name of West 12th Road. Those of us who live there know that the nice part about living in a small town is that when you are not quite sure what is going on, someone else always does!
[Peter J. Mahon West 12th Road, Broad Channel]
Urge your Representative to vote "YES" on Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act (H.R. 3370 - as amended)
Urge Your U.S. House Members to Vote "YES"
On the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014,
H.R. 3370 (as amended)
The U.S. House of Representatives is poised to begin debate this week on the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (H.R. 3370, as amended). Please urge your House Member to vote “yes” on the measure.
H.R. 3370 was originally introduced as a companion bill to the Senate measure (S. 1926)—also known as the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014. However, the original legislative text has been replaced with completely new language. The amended bill will be considered under a procedure that will require a 2/3 majority vote to pass and does not allow for any amendments.
H.R. 3370 (as amended) contains several provisions that would address county concerns::
Reinstates Grandfathering: The House bill would permanently repeal Biggert-Waters’ phase-out of grandfathered policies and thus would allow grandfathering of policies to continue. This means that post-FIRM properties built to code at the time of construction may have the ability to grandfather into a lower premium.
Removes Sales Trigger: The House bill would discontinue the practice of fully actualizing rates at the point of sale, meaning the sales “trigger” is removed; this would ensure premium insurance rate certainty at the point of sale.
Retroactively Refunds Policyholders: The House bill would retroactively refund some Pre-FIRM policyholders if they paid a higher premium under Biggert-Waters.
Allows for Annual Surcharge: The House bill would institute a $25 annual surcharge for all NFIP primary home policy holders and a $250 annual surcharge on all second homes and businesses. All revenue from these surcharges go toward the NFIP reserve fund, established to meet the future obligations of the NFIP.
Requires Affordability Study and Provides Additional Funding for the Study: The House bill would increase funding for FEMA to complete an affordability study from $750,000 (under Biggert-Waters) to $3 million. The measure would also reaffirm that the study be completed in two years.
Background Information and Why This Issue Matters to Counties
The purpose of the Biggert-Waters Act of 2012 (BW-12) was to make FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which faced a deficit of $24 billion, solvent. However, BW-12 resulted in some unintended consequences for local governments, residents and businesses.
A number of the nation's 3,069 counties, both coastal and inland, have stated that their homeowners and business are facing drastically increasing annual NFIP flood insurance premiums due to BW-12's phase-outs of subsidized premium rates. According to the Government Accountability Office, properties in 2,930 counties had subsidized policies as of June, 2012.
Since selling properties with high annual insurance premiums is unlikely, people could walk away from existing mortgages, impacting both local economies and housing markets. As more homes become vacant, counties' property values are in turn impacted.
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which oversees the NFIP program, continues to update its Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), more low-lying areas may begin to face drastic premium rate increases in the future.
NACo supports a sustainable, fiscally responsible NFIP that protects the businesses and homeowners who built according to code and have followed all applicable laws. We also support amending BW-12 in a way that keeps flood insurance rates affordable while balancing the fiscal solvency of the program. Further, NACo supports reinstating the grandfathering of properties (not policies) that were built to code, have maintained insurance and have not repeatedly flooded.
Click hereto view NACo’s presentation on Biggert-Waters and the National Flood Insurance Program
Click here to view NACo’s comparison chart on the different provisions under current law (BW-12), S. 1926 and H.R. 3370 (as amended)
Click here to read NACo’s letter of support for H.R. 3370 (as amended)
If you have any questions or comments, please contact NACo Associate Legislative Directors Julie Ufner at firstname.lastname@example.org or 202.942.4269 or Yejin Jang at email@example.com or 202.942.4239.
We hope that you will join us in Washington, D.C. on March 1-5 for NACo's 2014 legislative Conference where these and other important issues will be discussed. Fore more information, including registration information, click here.