While
some South Queens residents breathed sighs of relief about
the preliminary flood maps released by the Federal Emergency Management agency
on Monday, they said the new documents are by no means a cure for what many
worry will be devastating hikes in flood insurance rates.
The proposed federal
maps released this week, which replace the previously released Advisory Base
Flood Elevation maps that were rushed out right after Hurricane Sandy and still
have a lengthy approval and appeal process to undergo before they are
implemented and impact insurance rates, remove all of Broad Channel from what
is known as flood zone V. Many residents in zone V would have to fork over
significant amounts of money to raise their houses – which federal officials
say is necessary to protect them in storms – as well as face increased
insurance rates because they live in an area FEMA designates as the most prone
to flooding. Instead, FEMA placed Broad Channel in the AE zone – which reduces
the area’s base flood elevation – which would dictate by how much residents
would be mandated to elevate their homes – from 15 to 10 feet.
“The bad news is
that this revised flood zone designation, although welcome, is no panacea for
the burdensome and extraordinarily expensive flood insurance regulations and
rate increases contained in the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of
2012,” West 12th Road Block Association
President Peter Mahon wrote.
The Biggert-Waters
legislation, approved by Congress last year, phases out some subsidized insurance
rates and allows for rate increases of 20 to 25 percent a year until properties
reach actuarial status. While supporters of the legislation have said it was
meant to make a debt-ridden National Flood Insurance Program more fiscally
stable, homeowners in Queens – and throughout
the country – said the new rates would force many from their homes because they
would no longer be able to afford to live there.
“This could be a
town killer,” Mahon said. “This could
turn Broad Channel into a community of foreclosed homes.”
While Broad Channel
escapes being placed in the worst zone, parts of the Rockaways, including
sections of Breezy Point and Rockaway Park, does not escape that fate – and,
according to the proposed maps, 500 families – an increase of 200 families –
are situated in areas where they would have to raise their homes and
potentially shell out tens of thousands of dollars for flood insurance
premiums.
Because of FEMA’s
ongoing study of how many people are living in areas prone to flooding – which
is expected to increase from about 218,000 in the 1983 New York City maps to
about 400,000 in the most recent maps, Mayor Bloomberg on Tuesday outlined a
proposal that he says will help to protect the city from future weather events.
“As bad as Sandy was, future storms
could be even worse,” Bloomberg said during a press conference. “In fact,
because of rising temperatures and sea levels, even a storm that’s not as large
as Sandy could, down the road, be even more
destructive.”
The proposal
announced on Tuesday, a 430-page document, would cost about $20 billion, the
mayor said, and would include such initiatives as fortifying infrastructure
like the city’s power grid, to studying the feasibility of surge barriers
across the mouth of Jamaica Bay.
Additionally, Bloomberg
said he aims to have the city work with the U.S. Army Corps to construct a dune
project along the Rockaway Peninsula. The mayor also
proposed implementing bulkheads – which are typically made of stone and
concrete and hold shorelines in place – in such places as Howard Beach and
Broad Channel.
As part of the same
initiative, the city would repair bulkheads on the Belt parkway that failed
during Hurricane Sandy and repair and improve bulkheads from Beach 143rd Street to Beach 116th Street along Beach Channel
Drive in Rockaway.
By Anna Gustafson
So I will say it again: Biggert-Waters was to bail out debt-ridden NFIP, which was primarily saddled with debt because no one was watching how money was distributed after Katrina and Wilma.
ReplyDeleteAnd again my question: why are we being required to pay flood insurance premiums when our claims are not fully paid? The risk is all on the homeowner, once you get someone to explain what your policy actually says. This is a community killer too because it is bankrupting people, but it's legal. This is no better than what the banks and other lenders did during the housing bubble, and this is legal. If I set something u0 this way, I'd be sent to Levonworth, KS, and not to hang out with Dorothy and Totto.