FEMA
Report: Climate Change Could Increase Areas at Risk of Flood by 45 Percent
A landmark study finds climate change could have a huge impact
on the National Flood Insurance Program.
—By Kate Sheppard and James West
Cleanup in Breezy Point,
|
Rising seas and increasingly severe weather
are expected to increase the areas of the United States at risk of floods by
up to 45 percent by 2100, according to a first-of-its-kind report released by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency on Wednesday. These changes could double the
number of flood-prone properties covered by the National Flood Insurance
Program and drastically increase the costs of floods, the report finds.
The report concludes
that climate change is likely to expand vastly the size and costs of the
45-year-old government flood insurance program. Like previous government
reports, it anticipates that sea levels will rise an average of four feet by the end of the century. But this is
what's new: The portion of the US at risk for flooding,
including coastal regions and areas along rivers, will grow between 40 and 45
percent by the end of the century. That shift will hammer the flood insurance
program. Premiums paid into the program totaled $3.2 billion in 2009, but that
figure could grow to $5.4 billion by 2040 and up to $11.2 billion by the year
2100, the report found. The 257-page study has been in the works for nearly
five years and was finally released by FEMA after multiple inquiries from
Climate Desk and Mother Jones.
The report attributes only 30 percent of the
increased risk of flooding to population growth; 70 percent is due to climate
change. FEMA designates what are known as special flood hazard areas, where there is a 1
percent risk in any given year of a major flood occurring. (They're also known
as 100-year floodplains.) If you have a federally backed mortgage on your home
and it's in a special flood hazard area, you arerequired by law to carry flood insurance. As of
2013, the NFIP insures 5.6 million properties. But that number could double by
2100, to as many as 11.2 million, the report found.
Having to insure twice
as many properties would be a big deal for the NFIP. It generally works like
any other insurance program, using the premiums that policy holders pay in each
year to cover losses when they occur. But the program has been walloped by
major storms in the past decade. The NFIP went $16 billion in debt on
Hurricane Katrina and after Sandy will be $25 billion
in the hole, a debt it may be unable repay. The report projects that the
average loss on each insured property could increase as much as 90 percent by
2100. If future storm victims aren't forced to eat their losses, taxpayers may
have to cover the difference.
The FEMA study is
based on the assumption that sea levels will go up by four feet in the next 86
years. But a report released last year by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration noted that sea level rise could be more than six feet. Whether it's four feet or
six feet, rising seas cause shoreline erosion and recession, and create greater
surge risk in the event of major storms. The FEMA report also notes that
flooding around rivers will likely become worse in a warming world, due to
changes in precipitation frequency and intensity. Population growth, which
causes increases in paved areas and changes in runoff patterns and drainage
systems, will affect the amount of flooding from rivers, the FEMA report notes.
The
FEMA findings paint a grim picture for an insurance program that is already
debt-laden and is one of the largest fiscal liabilities for the US government. The projections for
climate costs make it appear much less likely that the program will ever be fiscally
sound without significant changes. The report warns that future payments from
the program "may be larger than the NFIP's current funding and
borrowing structure accommodates."
Climate
change has been conspicuously absent from the formulation of FEMA's projections. But this report
finds that climate change is a major driver of increased flood risk, and FEMA
is expected to start considering climate change as it draws up maps
highlighting areas that could face future flooding.
Climate change will likely make flood
insurance much more expensive for the federal government, but also for
individual policyholders. Right now, a number of homeowners who get their flood
insurance from the federal government pay subsidized rates. But for the program
to stay solvent, the average price of policies would need to increase by as
much as 70 percent to offset projected losses, according to the FEMA report.
That means individual policyholders who now pay an average rate of $560 per
year could have to pay as much as $952 per year by 2100.
The report, which was
put together by the consulting firm AECOM, stated
that it is intended to serve as a "scoping-level study" and is not a
set of policy recommendations. The point is to "serve as the foundation
for more refined analysis as the science of climate change advances."
So for clarity, can anyone say if NFIP ever fully paid off the entire $16 billion after Katrina? And is the $25 billion post-Sandy figure only from Sandy?
ReplyDeleteAt the 6 month Sandy town hall meeting that was televised on pbs on May 16th, it was suggested by one of the guests on stage at Monmouth University that Biggert-Waters was to also to assist with residual Katrina/Wilma debt to NFIP.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletenice blog.
ReplyDelete